Legislature(1995 - 1996)
1996-05-05 Senate Journal
Full Journal pdf1996-05-05 Senate Journal Page 4018 SB 210 Senator Halford moved and asked unanimous consent that SENATE BILL NO. 210 An Act relating to taxes on cigarettes and tobacco products; and providing for an effective date be taken up at this time. Without objection, it was so ordered. SB 210 SENATE BILL NO. 210 An Act relating to taxes on cigarettes and tobacco products; and providing for an effective date was read the second time. 1996-05-05 Senate Journal Page 4019 SB 210 Senator Sharp, Chair, moved and asked unanimous consent for the adoption of the State Affairs Committee Substitute offered on page 3042. Without objection, CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 210(STA) was adopted and read the second time. Senator Adams offered Amendment No. 1 : Page 1, lines 9 - 11: Delete all material and insert: "(2) 10 percent to be used by the Department of Health and Social Services as pass-through grants to recipients conducting anti-tobacco use, anti-smoking, or stop smoking programs; and" Senator Adams moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 1. Senator Halford objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 210(STA) Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 9 NAYS: 11 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Kelly, Lincoln, Miller, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Donley, Frank, Green, Halford, Leman, Pearce, R.Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson and so, Amendment No. 1 failed. Senator Halford moved and asked unanimous consent that the bill be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading and placed on final passage. Without objection, it was so ordered. CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 210(STA) was read the third time. Senators Rieger, Sharp moved and asked unanimous consent that they be shown as cosponsors on the bill. Without objection, it was so ordered. 1996-05-05 Senate Journal Page 4020 SB 210 The question being: Shall CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 210(STA) An Act relating to taxes on cigarettes and tobacco products; and providing for an effective date pass the Senate? The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 210(STA) Third Reading - Final Passage Effective Date YEAS: 17 NAYS: 3 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Frank, Halford, Hoffman, Kelly, Leman, Lincoln, Miller, Pearce, R.Phillips, Rieger, Salo, Sharp, Torgerson, Zharoff Nays: Donley, Green, Taylor and so, CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 210(STA) passed the Senate. Senator Halford moved and asked unanimous consent that the vote on the passage of the bill be considered the vote on the effective date clause. Without objection, it was so ordered.